AUSTIN – Texas House Leaders Face Critical Decision Following High-Stakes School Choice Rally and Committee Hearing
Texas House leaders are confronting a significant decision following a high-pressure school choice rally and a marathon committee hearing on House Bill 3, the House’s version of school choice. The bill, while similar to Senate Bill 2, which passed last month, introduces key differences that could shape the future of education in the state.
For any education-related legislation to progress to the governor’s desk, a crucial compromise between the two chambers will be necessary.
FOX 7’s Rudy Koski recently sat down with Mandy Drogin, campaign director of Next Generation Texas at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, to discuss the implications of school choice and its potential impact on Texas families.
Koski: “Mandy, why is it so important for lawmakers to support school choice?”
Drogin: “It’s essential that lawmakers understand the value of empowering parents to make the best decisions for their children. Parents know their children better than anyone, and they should have the freedom to choose the best educational path for them.”
Koski: “But does this bill undermine public education?”
Drogin: “Absolutely not. As a public school parent myself, I can tell you that we must acknowledge the reality that nearly half of the students in our classrooms today are not reading at grade level. This has been an ongoing issue for over a decade. Supporting school choice does not mean abandoning public schools. Rather, it ensures that every parent has the ability to choose the best education for their child. The current system, which often ties educational options to where a child lives, doesn’t serve every student.”
Koski: “But some critics argue that the plan doesn’t truly serve all parents. The process may be universal, but the selection process is not.”
Drogin: “The eligibility is key. While the program may not be universal in the way some critics hope, it will provide access to 100,000 students—far from a limited group.”
Koski: “But that’s a fraction of the 5 million children in Texas. How do you respond to that?”
Drogin: “It’s important to recognize that we can have both: we can continue to invest in public schools while expanding school choice. The state’s budget includes $8 billion more for education through House Bill 2, bringing the total to more than $100 billion. There’s ample opportunity to fund both priorities.”
Koski: “Critics argue that the additional funding is simply a tax reduction, not new money for education. Is that a fair assessment?”
Drogin: “That’s absolutely incorrect. There are two distinct pieces of legislation at play. The funding for school choice and the broader budget allocation are separate and address different needs.”
Koski: “So, is the issue more about labeling than substance?”
Drogin: “No, it’s not a labeling issue. What’s important to understand is that this isn’t a ‘voucher’ system as critics often claim. It’s an education savings account that allows parents to customize their child’s education. This is not a scholarship program, and there will be no mass exodus from public schools. All students in Texas are eligible, but funding is currently limited to $1 billion, which will serve approximately 100,000 students, with priority given to low- and middle-income families, as well as special education students.”
Koski: “Is the plan to revisit funding levels later, contingent on the state’s surplus?”
Drogin: “Yes, at this point, additional funding will depend on demand and available resources.”
As the debate continues, the outcome of these discussions will likely determine the future of school choice in Texas. Lawmakers will need to balance the needs of public schools with the growing desire for educational flexibility and parental empowerment.